Skip to content
PartyReport Cards

Party report card · current MPs

Aam Aadmi Party

6 MPs · 3 Lok Sabha · 3 Rajya Sabha · from 2 states

Party score66/1006th of 26 ranked parties

Allocated to its MPs

₹98.27 Cr

6 MPs

Fund utilisation

83%

₹81.89 Cr recommended
Above national figure (72%)

Paid to vendors

₹42.96 Cr

44% of allocation
Above national figure (38%)

Works completed

646

37% of recommended
Above national figure (34%)

From recommendation to completion

All works recommended by this party’s MPs

  1. Recommended by its MPs1,762 works

    ₹81.89 Cr · 83% of the ₹98.27 Cr allocated

  2. Sanctioned by districts1,489 works

    85% sanctioned · 49 days on average (due within 45 days)

  3. Completed646 works

    ₹26.26 Cr final cost

273 works await sanction, 149 of them for more than 45 days. Sanction is the district authority’s job, not the MP’s.

In plain words

What the numbers say

  • AAP’s 6 MPs were allocated ₹98.27 Cr and recommended works worth ₹81.89 Cr (83%), against 72% for all MPs.
  • ₹42.96 Cr has been paid to vendors, 44% of the allocation (all MPs: 38%).
  • The biggest share of its works’ value went to Community buildings & public spaces (29%).
  • Its highest-scoring MPs: Shri Sant Balbir Singh, Gurmeet Singh Meet Hayer, Malvinder Singh Kang.
  • 0 of its MPs have at least one published warning flag.

How the party score is made

66/100 on all its MPs’ works and money combined. The black marks show all MPs together (59/100). Median MP score: 61.

  1. Works completed 25%37Completed ÷ recommended works.
  2. Spending efficiency 18%61Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
  3. Fund utilisation 15%83Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
  4. Proof of work 12%79Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
  5. Funds spent 10%44Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
  6. Sanction speed 10%95Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
  7. Vendor diversity 10%
    i

    Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.

    99
    How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.

Activity over time

Recommendations, payments and completions by month, for this party’s MPs

Value of works MPs recommended each month

Sectors

Share of the value of its works, with the share for all MPs

States

Where its MPs come from

StateMPsUtilisationSpent
Punjab492%59%
Delhi267%15%

Its MPs

Ranked by MP score. Each name opens the MP’s full report card on the MPLADS Tracker.

#MPStateAllocatedUtilisationSpentCompletedScore
1Shri Sant Balbir Singh Rajya SabhaPunjab₹19.64 Cr97%73%20773
2Gurmeet Singh Meet Hayer Lok Sabha · SangrurPunjab₹14.70 Cr79%43%15863
3Malvinder Singh Kang Lok Sabha · Anandpur SahibPunjab₹14.70 Cr95%61%12561
4Dr. Raj Kumar Chabbewal Lok Sabha · HoshiarpurPunjab₹14.70 Cr97%57%12360
5Shri Narain Dass Gupta Rajya SabhaDelhi₹16.08 Cr47%18%1555
6Shri Sanjay Singh Rajya SabhaDelhi₹18.45 Cr83%12%1855

Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)); party from the official Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha member lists. Party totals add up its current MPs. Methodology · Scheme guide