Skip to content
PartyReport Cards

Party report card · current MPs

All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen

1 MPs · 1 Lok Sabha · 0 Rajya Sabha · from 1 state

Party score33/100Not ranked (fewer than 3 MPs or no party)
CompareSectors by party

Allocated to its MPs

₹14.70 Cr

1 MPs

Fund utilisation

80%

₹11.81 Cr recommended
Above national figure (72%)

Paid to vendors

₹1.12 Cr

7.6% of allocation
Below national figure (38%)

Works completed

1

3.4% of recommended
Below national figure (34%)

From recommendation to completion

All works recommended by this party’s MPs

  1. Recommended by its MPs29 works

    ₹11.81 Cr · 80% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated

  2. Sanctioned by districts8 works

    28% sanctioned · 55 days on average (due within 45 days)

  3. Completed1 works

    ₹56.6 L final cost

21 works await sanction, 15 of them for more than 45 days. Sanction is the district authority’s job, not the MP’s.

In plain words

What the numbers say

  • AIMIM’s 1 MPs were allocated ₹14.70 Cr and recommended works worth ₹11.81 Cr (80%), against 72% for all MPs.
  • ₹1.12 Cr has been paid to vendors, 7.6% of the allocation (all MPs: 38%).
  • The biggest share of its works’ value went to Health (30%).
  • Its highest-scoring MPs: Asaduddin Owaisi.
  • 1 of its MPs have at least one published warning flag.

How the party score is made

33/100 on all its MPs’ works and money combined. The black marks show all MPs together (59/100). Median MP score: 28.

  1. Works completed 25%3Completed ÷ recommended works.
  2. Spending efficiency 18%51Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
  3. Fund utilisation 15%80Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
  4. Proof of work 12%20Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
  5. Funds spent 10%8Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
  6. Sanction speed 10%73Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
  7. Vendor diversity 10%
    i

    Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.

    10    How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.

Activity over time

Recommendations, payments and completions by month, for this party’s MPs

Value of works MPs recommended each month

Sectors

Share of the value of its works, with the share for all MPs

  1. Healthall MPs 2.9%₹3.50 Cr · 30%
  2. Drinking waterall MPs 5.2%₹3.08 Cr · 26%
  3. Community buildings & public spacesall MPs 26%₹2.18 Cr · 18%
  4. Education & librariesall MPs 12%₹1.64 Cr · 14%
  5. Safety & securityall MPs 1.4%₹1.31 Cr · 11%
  6. Divyang & social welfareall MPs 0.4%₹9.1 L · 0.8%

States

Where its MPs come from

StateMPsUtilisationSpent
Telangana180%7.6%

Its MPs

Ranked by MP score. Each name opens the MP’s full report card on the MPLADS Tracker.

#MPStateAllocatedUtilisationSpentCompletedScore
1Asaduddin Owaisi Lok Sabha · Hyderabad · 3 flagsTelangana₹14.70 Cr80%7.6%128

Warning flags among its MPs

Published threshold rules: prompts for questions, not findings

  1. Works waiting for sanction1 MPs
  2. Recommended, but little spent1 MPs
  3. Payments concentrated with one vendor1 MPs

Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)); party from the official Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha member lists. Party totals add up its current MPs. Methodology · Scheme guide