Skip to content
PartyReport Cards

Party report card · current MPs

Jharkhand Mukti Morcha

6 MPs · 3 Lok Sabha · 3 Rajya Sabha · from 1 state

Party score46/10023rd of 26 ranked parties

Allocated to its MPs

₹90.17 Cr

6 MPs

Fund utilisation

78%

₹69.97 Cr recommended
Above national figure (72%)

Paid to vendors

₹45.13 Cr

50% of allocation
Above national figure (38%)

Works completed

299

14% of recommended
Below national figure (34%)

From recommendation to completion

All works recommended by this party’s MPs

  1. Recommended by its MPs2,068 works

    ₹69.97 Cr · 78% of the ₹90.17 Cr allocated

  2. Sanctioned by districts1,470 works

    71% sanctioned · 2.7 months on average (due within 45 days)

  3. Completed299 works

    ₹14.03 Cr final cost

598 works await sanction, 506 of them for more than 45 days. Sanction is the district authority’s job, not the MP’s.

In plain words

What the numbers say

  • JMM’s 6 MPs were allocated ₹90.17 Cr and recommended works worth ₹69.97 Cr (78%), against 72% for all MPs.
  • ₹45.13 Cr has been paid to vendors, 50% of the allocation (all MPs: 38%).
  • The biggest share of its works’ value went to Roads & bridges (36%).
  • Its highest-scoring MPs: Nalin Soren, Smt. Mahua Maji, Dr. Sarfraz Ahmad.
  • 4 of its MPs have at least one published warning flag.

How the party score is made

46/100 on all its MPs’ works and money combined. The black marks show all MPs together (59/100). Median MP score: 31.

  1. Works completed 25%14Completed ÷ recommended works.
  2. Spending efficiency 18%31Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
  3. Fund utilisation 15%78Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
  4. Proof of work 12%38Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
  5. Funds spent 10%50Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
  6. Sanction speed 10%82Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
  7. Vendor diversity 10%
    i

    Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.

    69
    How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.

Activity over time

Recommendations, payments and completions by month, for this party’s MPs

Value of works MPs recommended each month

Sectors

Share of the value of its works, with the share for all MPs

States

Where its MPs come from

StateMPsUtilisationSpent
Jharkhand678%50%

Its MPs

Ranked by MP score. Each name opens the MP’s full report card on the MPLADS Tracker.

#MPStateAllocatedUtilisationSpentCompletedScore
1Nalin Soren Lok Sabha · DumkaJharkhand₹14.74 Cr96%70%10656
2Smt. Mahua Maji Rajya SabhaJharkhand₹23.25 Cr90%74%15046
3Dr. Sarfraz Ahmad Rajya Sabha · 1 flagJharkhand₹17.86 Cr93%47%4343
4Vijay Kumar Hansdak Lok Sabha · Rajmahal · 1 flagJharkhand₹14.72 Cr71%23%020
5Joba Majhi Lok Sabha · Singhbhum · 2 flagsJharkhand₹14.70 Cr53%40%018
6Shri Baidyanath Ram Rajya Sabha · 1 flagJharkhand₹4.90 Cr0%0%00

Warning flags among its MPs

Published threshold rules: prompts for questions, not findings

Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)); party from the official Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha member lists. Party totals add up its current MPs. Methodology · Scheme guide