Party report card · current MPs
Nominated (no party)
6 MPs · 0 Lok Sabha · 6 Rajya Sabha · from 5 states
Allocated to its MPs
₹102.9 Cr
6 MPs
Fund utilisation
67%
₹68.49 Cr recommended
Below national figure (72%)
Paid to vendors
₹34.70 Cr
34% of allocation
Below national figure (38%)
Works completed
454
53% of recommended
Above national figure (34%)
From recommendation to completion
All works recommended by this party’s MPs
- Recommended by its MPs852 works
₹68.49 Cr · 67% of the ₹102.9 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by districts766 works
90% sanctioned · 7.9 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed454 works
₹17.75 Cr final cost
86 works await sanction, 76 of them for more than 45 days. Sanction is the district authority’s job, not the MP’s.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- NOM’s 6 MPs were allocated ₹102.9 Cr and recommended works worth ₹68.49 Cr (67%), against 72% for all MPs.
- ₹34.70 Cr has been paid to vendors, 34% of the allocation (all MPs: 38%).
- The biggest share of its works’ value went to Community buildings & public spaces (30%).
- Its highest-scoring MPs: Dr. Dharmasthala Veerendra Heggade, Smt. P. T. Usha, Shri Ilaiyaraaja.
- 2 of its MPs have at least one published warning flag.
How the party score is made
61/100 on all its MPs’ works and money combined. The black marks show all MPs together (59/100). Median MP score: 61.
- Works completed 25%53Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 18%51Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%67Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 12%88Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%34Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Sanction speed 10%65Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
- Vendor diversity 10%78How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month, for this party’s MPs
Sectors
Share of the value of its works, with the share for all MPs
States
Where its MPs come from
| State | MPs | Utilisation | Spent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Karnataka | 2 | 83% | 41% |
| Tamil Nadu | 1 | 24% | 21% |
| Kerala | 1 | 74% | 32% |
| Andhra Pradesh | 1 | 89% | 51% |
| Delhi | 1 | 39% | 0.1% |
Its MPs
Ranked by MP score. Each name opens the MP’s full report card on the MPLADS Tracker.
| # | MP | State | Allocated | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dr. Dharmasthala Veerendra Heggade Rajya Sabha | Karnataka | ₹19.61 Cr | 70% | 32% | 304 | 67 |
| 2 | Smt. P. T. Usha Rajya Sabha | Kerala | ₹19.61 Cr | 74% | 32% | 54 | 65 |
| 3 | Shri Ilaiyaraaja Rajya Sabha · 1 flag | Tamil Nadu | ₹22.06 Cr | 24% | 21% | 17 | 61 |
| 4 | Shri V. Vijayendra Prasad Rajya Sabha | Andhra Pradesh | ₹19.61 Cr | 89% | 51% | 79 | 60 |
| 5 | Smt. Sudha Murty Rajya Sabha · 1 flag | Karnataka | ₹14.70 Cr | 100% | 52% | 0 | 21 |
| 6 | Dr. Meenakshi Jain Rajya Sabha | Delhi | ₹7.35 Cr | 39% | 0.1% | 0 | 8 |
Warning flags among its MPs
Published threshold rules: prompts for questions, not findings
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)); party from the official Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha member lists. Party totals add up its current MPs. Methodology · Scheme guide