Skip to content
PartyReport Cards

Party report card · current MPs

Rashtriya Lok Dal

3 MPs · 2 Lok Sabha · 1 Rajya Sabha · from 1 state

Party score41/10025th of 26 ranked parties
CompareSectors by party

Allocated to its MPs

₹50.81 Cr

3 MPs

Fund utilisation

79%

₹40.35 Cr recommended
Above national figure (72%)

Paid to vendors

₹16.89 Cr

33% of allocation
Below national figure (38%)

Works completed

39

13% of recommended
Below national figure (34%)

From recommendation to completion

All works recommended by this party’s MPs

  1. Recommended by its MPs307 works

    ₹40.35 Cr · 79% of the ₹50.81 Cr allocated

  2. Sanctioned by districts198 works

    64% sanctioned · 5.8 months on average (due within 45 days)

  3. Completed39 works

    ₹3.97 Cr final cost

109 works await sanction, 94 of them for more than 45 days. Sanction is the district authority’s job, not the MP’s.

In plain words

What the numbers say

  • RLD’s 3 MPs were allocated ₹50.81 Cr and recommended works worth ₹40.35 Cr (79%), against 72% for all MPs.
  • ₹16.89 Cr has been paid to vendors, 33% of the allocation (all MPs: 38%).
  • The biggest share of its works’ value went to Roads & bridges (48%).
  • Its highest-scoring MPs: Shri Jayant Chaudhary, Chandan Chauhan, Dr Rajkumar Sangwan.
  • 1 of its MPs have at least one published warning flag.

How the party score is made

41/100 on all its MPs’ works and money combined. The black marks show all MPs together (59/100). Median MP score: 41.

  1. Works completed 25%13Completed ÷ recommended works.
  2. Spending efficiency 18%24Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
  3. Fund utilisation 15%79Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
  4. Proof of work 12%31Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
  5. Funds spent 10%33Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
  6. Sanction speed 10%64Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
  7. Vendor diversity 10%
    i

    Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.

    79    How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.

Activity over time

Recommendations, payments and completions by month, for this party’s MPs

Value of works MPs recommended each month

Sectors

Share of the value of its works, with the share for all MPs

  1. Roads & bridgesall MPs 28%₹19.23 Cr · 48%
  2. Sports & fitnessall MPs 4.3%₹18.72 Cr · 46%
  3. Community buildings & public spacesall MPs 26%₹1.65 Cr · 4.1%
  4. Education & librariesall MPs 12%₹55.8 L · 1.4%
  5. Electricity & lightingall MPs 16%₹14.0 L · 0.3%
  6. Sanitation & drainageall MPs 2.0%₹6.0 L · 0.1%

States

Where its MPs come from

StateMPsUtilisationSpent
Uttar Pradesh379%33%

Its MPs

Ranked by MP score. Each name opens the MP’s full report card on the MPLADS Tracker.

#MPStateAllocatedUtilisationSpentCompletedScore
1Shri Jayant Chaudhary Rajya SabhaUttar Pradesh₹21.41 Cr86%20%849
2Chandan Chauhan Lok Sabha · BijnorUttar Pradesh₹14.70 Cr84%56%1541
3Dr Rajkumar Sangwan Lok Sabha · Baghpat · 2 flagsUttar Pradesh₹14.70 Cr66%30%1626

Warning flags among its MPs

Published threshold rules: prompts for questions, not findings

  1. Works waiting for sanction1 MPs
  2. Payments concentrated with one vendor1 MPs

Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)); party from the official Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha member lists. Party totals add up its current MPs. Methodology · Scheme guide