Skip to content
PartyReport Cards
RPI(A)

Party report card · current MPs

Republican Party of India (Athawale)

1 MPs · 0 Lok Sabha · 1 Rajya Sabha · from 1 state

Party score22/100Not ranked (fewer than 3 MPs or no party)
CompareSectors by party

Allocated to its MPs

₹6.92 Cr

1 MPs

Fund utilisation

73%

₹5.07 Cr recommended
About the national figure

Paid to vendors

₹0

0% of allocation
Below national figure (38%)

Works completed

0

0% of recommended
Below national figure (34%)

From recommendation to completion

All works recommended by this party’s MPs

  1. Recommended by its MPs35 works

    ₹5.07 Cr · 73% of the ₹6.92 Cr allocated

  2. Sanctioned by districts0 works

    0% sanctioned

  3. Completed0 works

    ₹0 final cost

35 works await sanction, 18 of them for more than 45 days. Sanction is the district authority’s job, not the MP’s.

In plain words

What the numbers say

  • RPI(A)’s 1 MPs were allocated ₹6.92 Cr and recommended works worth ₹5.07 Cr (73%), against 72% for all MPs.
  • ₹0 has been paid to vendors, 0% of the allocation (all MPs: 38%).
  • The biggest share of its works’ value went to Roads & bridges (39%).
  • Its highest-scoring MPs: Shri Ramdas Bandu Athawale.
  • 1 of its MPs have at least one published warning flag.

How the party score is made

22/100 on all its MPs’ works and money combined. The black marks show all MPs together (59/100). Median MP score: 16.

  1. Works completed 25%0Completed ÷ recommended works.
  2. Spending efficiency 18%Not enough dataValue of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
  3. Fund utilisation 15%73Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
  4. Proof of work 12%0Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
  5. Funds spent 10%0Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
  6. Sanction speed 10%49Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
  7. Vendor diversity 10%
    i

    Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.

    Not enough data    How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.

Activity over time

Recommendations, payments and completions by month, for this party’s MPs

Value of works MPs recommended each month

Sectors

Share of the value of its works, with the share for all MPs

  1. Roads & bridgesall MPs 28%₹2.00 Cr · 39%
  2. Community buildings & public spacesall MPs 26%₹1.05 Cr · 21%
  3. Sanitation & drainageall MPs 2.0%₹80.0 L · 16%
  4. Education & librariesall MPs 12%₹50.0 L · 9.9%
  5. Healthall MPs 2.9%₹32.0 L · 6.3%
  6. Safety & securityall MPs 1.4%₹20.0 L · 3.9%
  7. Electricity & lightingall MPs 16%₹20.0 L · 3.9%

States

Where its MPs come from

StateMPsUtilisationSpent
Maharashtra173%0%

Its MPs

Ranked by MP score. Each name opens the MP’s full report card on the MPLADS Tracker.

#MPStateAllocatedUtilisationSpentCompletedScore
1Shri Ramdas Bandu Athawale Rajya Sabha · 3 flagsMaharashtra₹6.92 Cr73%0%016

Warning flags among its MPs

Published threshold rules: prompts for questions, not findings

  1. Works waiting for sanction1 MPs
  2. Recommended, but little spent1 MPs
  3. No completed works reported1 MPs

Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)); party from the official Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha member lists. Party totals add up its current MPs. Methodology · Scheme guide