Party report card · current MPs
Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)
4 MPs · 3 Lok Sabha · 1 Rajya Sabha · from 1 state
Allocated to its MPs
₹64.29 Cr
4 MPs
Fund utilisation
93%
₹59.73 Cr recommended
Above national figure (72%)
Paid to vendors
₹25.60 Cr
40% of allocation
Above national figure (38%)
Works completed
44
13% of recommended
Below national figure (34%)
From recommendation to completion
All works recommended by this party’s MPs
- Recommended by its MPs338 works
₹59.73 Cr · 93% of the ₹64.29 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by districts206 works
61% sanctioned · 8.5 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed44 works
₹5.60 Cr final cost
132 works await sanction, 110 of them for more than 45 days. Sanction is the district authority’s job, not the MP’s.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- SS(UBT)’s 4 MPs were allocated ₹64.29 Cr and recommended works worth ₹59.73 Cr (93%), against 72% for all MPs.
- ₹25.60 Cr has been paid to vendors, 40% of the allocation (all MPs: 38%).
- The biggest share of its works’ value went to Roads & bridges (50%).
- Its highest-scoring MPs: Arvind Ganpat Sawant, Rajabhau, Shri Sanjay Raut.
- 2 of its MPs have at least one published warning flag.
How the party score is made
51/100 on all its MPs’ works and money combined. The black marks show all MPs together (59/100). Median MP score: 49.
- Works completed 25%13Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 18%22Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%93Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 12%93Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%40Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Sanction speed 10%50Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
- Vendor diversity 10%98How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month, for this party’s MPs
Sectors
Share of the value of its works, with the share for all MPs
States
Where its MPs come from
| State | MPs | Utilisation | Spent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maharashtra | 4 | 93% | 40% |
Its MPs
Ranked by MP score. Each name opens the MP’s full report card on the MPLADS Tracker.
| # | MP | State | Allocated | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arvind Ganpat Sawant Lok Sabha · Mumbai South · 1 flag | Maharashtra | ₹14.70 Cr | 90% | 33% | 14 | 56 |
| 2 | Rajabhau Lok Sabha · Nashik | Maharashtra | ₹15.29 Cr | 83% | 40% | 22 | 54 |
| 3 | Shri Sanjay Raut Rajya Sabha | Maharashtra | ₹19.61 Cr | 99% | 38% | 8 | 45 |
| 4 | Anil Yeshwant Desai Lok Sabha · Mumbai South Central · 1 flag | Maharashtra | ₹14.70 Cr | 97% | 49% | 0 | 29 |
Warning flags among its MPs
Published threshold rules: prompts for questions, not findings
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)); party from the official Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha member lists. Party totals add up its current MPs. Methodology · Scheme guide