Skip to content
PartyReport Cards

Party report card · current MPs

United People’s Party Liberal

3 MPs · 1 Lok Sabha · 2 Rajya Sabha · from 1 state

Party score52/10019th of 26 ranked parties
CompareSectors by party

Allocated to its MPs

₹41.66 Cr

3 MPs

Fund utilisation

91%

₹38.04 Cr recommended
Above national figure (72%)

Paid to vendors

₹20.12 Cr

48% of allocation
Above national figure (38%)

Works completed

37

12% of recommended
Below national figure (34%)

From recommendation to completion

All works recommended by this party’s MPs

  1. Recommended by its MPs319 works

    ₹38.04 Cr · 91% of the ₹41.66 Cr allocated

  2. Sanctioned by districts210 works

    66% sanctioned · 8.4 months on average (due within 45 days)

  3. Completed37 works

    ₹4.11 Cr final cost

109 works await sanction, 105 of them for more than 45 days. Sanction is the district authority’s job, not the MP’s.

In plain words

What the numbers say

  • UPPL’s 3 MPs were allocated ₹41.66 Cr and recommended works worth ₹38.04 Cr (91%), against 72% for all MPs.
  • ₹20.12 Cr has been paid to vendors, 48% of the allocation (all MPs: 38%).
  • The biggest share of its works’ value went to Roads & bridges (50%).
  • Its highest-scoring MPs: Joyanta Basumatary, Shri Rwngwra Narzary, Shri Pramod Boro.
  • 2 of its MPs have at least one published warning flag.

How the party score is made

52/100 on all its MPs’ works and money combined. The black marks show all MPs together (59/100). Median MP score: 50.

  1. Works completed 25%12Completed ÷ recommended works.
  2. Spending efficiency 18%20Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
  3. Fund utilisation 15%91Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
  4. Proof of work 12%97Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
  5. Funds spent 10%48Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
  6. Sanction speed 10%51Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
  7. Vendor diversity 10%
    i

    Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.

    100    How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.

Activity over time

Recommendations, payments and completions by month, for this party’s MPs

Value of works MPs recommended each month

Sectors

Share of the value of its works, with the share for all MPs

  1. Roads & bridgesall MPs 28%₹18.84 Cr · 50%
  2. Community buildings & public spacesall MPs 26%₹10.19 Cr · 27%
  3. Education & librariesall MPs 12%₹2.99 Cr · 7.9%
  4. Irrigation, flood & environmentall MPs 2.2%₹2.99 Cr · 7.9%
  5. Drinking waterall MPs 5.2%₹85.0 L · 2.2%
  6. Electricity & lightingall MPs 16%₹69.9 L · 1.8%
  7. Sports & fitnessall MPs 4.3%₹66.0 L · 1.7%
  8. Sanitation & drainageall MPs 2.0%₹37.0 L · 1.0%
  9. Safety & securityall MPs 1.4%₹25.0 L · 0.7%
  10. Healthall MPs 2.9%₹20.0 L · 0.5%

States

Where its MPs come from

StateMPsUtilisationSpent
Assam391%48%

Its MPs

Ranked by MP score. Each name opens the MP’s full report card on the MPLADS Tracker.

#MPStateAllocatedUtilisationSpentCompletedScore
1Joyanta Basumatary Lok Sabha · Kokrajhar · 1 flagAssam₹14.70 Cr98%49%2055
2Shri Rwngwra Narzary Rajya SabhaAssam₹22.06 Cr93%58%1750
3Shri Pramod Boro Rajya Sabha · 3 flagsAssam₹4.90 Cr64%0.8%014

Warning flags among its MPs

Published threshold rules: prompts for questions, not findings

  1. Works waiting for sanction2 MPs
  2. Recommended, but little spent1 MPs
  3. No completed works reported1 MPs

Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)); party from the official Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha member lists. Party totals add up its current MPs. Methodology · Scheme guide